Showing posts with label twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label twitter. Show all posts

Friday, June 11, 2010

Magazine Innovation in Digital and Print

(Image source: NowPublic, 2008)

How many times have we bought a magazine, enticed by its glossy sheen and alluring model(s) on the cover, only to go home, flick through the pages and then leave it under the coffee table to be forgotten until the next spring cleaning session? Many of us are, or have been, guilty of this exact scenario, but all that might soon change.

Susan Currie Sivek’s article entitled “Magazines Require Innovation, Experiments in Digital and Print”, dated 1 April 2010 and published in MediaShift, talks about how traditional print magazines are beginning to innovate themselves in the digital media world and experiment with the different ways of storytelling styles, platforms, formats and revenue streams that new media has to offer. The Innovations in Magazines 2010 World Report which was released on 1 March 2010 could be the turning point for the magazine industry, as it provides many creative methods which aim at to make magazines fresh and new in an increasingly competitive media environment. Two other crucial points in the article are about how magazines still play a qualitative role in the print and media industry, and the fact that the digital revolution can save the environment by reducing the use of paper for print.

An article (Johnson-Greene, 2010) published in Folio mentions that Josh Gordon, president of Smarter Media Sales.com, and Raymond Roker, CEO/founder of URB magazine have suggested 4 tips for building a digital edition audience, which can be applied to magazines as well as other types of online media publishing. These 4 tips include:

• Attract readers with exclusive “digital extras”.
• Disregard the age demographics of online readers.
• Choose a host, partner or vendor carefully.
• Sharing is caring; social media is the best way to promote and advertise your productions.

In my opinion, it is only natural that magazines (and other traditional print media) extend their reach into the digital media world and innovate themselves to suit the habits and expectations of today’s audience. As Kress (1997) states, modern technologies make it simple to combine various modes of media publishing, which are likely to produce convergence or multi-modality in media.

Besides that, Walsh (2006) also points out that reading text on in a book and reading a page or website on screen are two very different experiences. Readers of a book are obliged to follow the linear style of the text, whereas the scanning pathway of internet browsers can be multilinear and multi-directional. Therefore, magazine publishers should make full use of new media technology to innovate their productions and ensure the continued support of their readers.


References:
  1. Johnson-Greene, C 2010, 4 Tips for Actively Building A Digital Edition Audience, FolioMag, viewed 11 June 2010, http://www.foliomag.com/2010/4-tips-actively-building-digital-edition-audience
  2. Kress, G 1997, 'Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication : the potentials of new forms of text', in Page to screen : taking literacy into the electronic era, ed I Snyder, Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards, N.S.W.
  3. Sivek, SC 2010, Magazines Require Innovation, Experiments in Digital and Print, Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), viewed 11 June 2010, http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2010/04/magazines-require-innovation-experiments-in-digital-and-print091.html
  4. Walsh, M 2006, 'The 'textual shift': Examining the reading process with print, visual and multimodal texts', Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 24-37.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Celebrity Tweets: Real or Fake?

(Image source: Twitter, 2010)

"Twitter now has more than 105 million registered users. It is growing at a rate of 300,000 new users signing up per day. Twitter users are posting an average of 55 million tweets, daily. 180 million unique visitors access the site every month." (Yarow, 2010)


These staggering numbers, revealed at Chirp in April 2010, sum up the social networking phenomenon that is Twitter. First launched in 2006, it has now become a fully-fledged online social networking and microblogging service, with celebrities, corporations, politicians, advertisers and ordinary citizens jumping onto this global bandwagon.

However, there are sure to be problems when a website gets as large and as popular as Twitter. In Owen's (2009) article, How Celebrity Imposters Hurt Twitter's Credibility, he highlights the issue regarding Twitter accounts impersonating celebrities and famous people such as the Dalai Lama and Shaquille O'Neal. This situation has become so common to the point that the real celebrities have to respond and prove that they are the real person to their fans. Nevertheless, as Twitter accounts are subject to hackers and pranksters, even the official accounts may not be producing true information, as seen in the case of Bill O Riley, Britney Spears and Obama (Arrington, 2009).

(Image source: Cartoon Stock, 2010)

According to Huberman, Romero and Fang (2008), Twitter is a tool for people seeking attention. Their study revealed that users who got attention from many people Tweeted more often than those who received little notice. They also claimed that many people besides celebrities, including scholars, advertisers and political activists, see online social networking sites as an opportunity to propagate ideas and ideals, form social bonds and promote viral marketing.

In June 2009, Twitter announced that it would be introducing a security measure called “verified accounts” for a select group of people in order to prevent fake tweets, after several cases of impersonation were brought to the public’s attention, especially the case of St Louis Cardinals baseball team manager Tony La Russa. This group of people ‘will include public officials, public agencies, famous artists, athletes, and other well known individuals at risk of impersonation’ (Ashford, 2009).

In my opinion, I think that as frequent internet users, we should be more careful about the information that we read online. The news that we receive might not necessarily be accurate or true, therefore we have to think critically and rationally instead of blindly accepting something we've seen or been told. As in the case of Twitter, it would be best to take co-founder Biz Stone's advice: When in doubt, the best way to determine authenticity is to check the official website of the person for a link back to their Twitter account (Owens, 2009; Ashford, 2009).


References:
  1. Ashford, W 2009, Twitter to verify accounts to prevent fake tweets, Computer Weekly, viewed 9 June 2010, http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/06/08/236332/twitter-to-verify-accounts-to-prevent-fake-tweets.htm
  2. Arrington, M 2009, Celebrity Twitter Accounts Hacked (Bill O'Reilly, Britney Spears, Obama, More), TechCrunch.com, viewed 9 June 2010, http://techcrunch.com/2009/01/05/either-fox-news-had-their-twitter-account-hacked-or-bill-oreilly-is-gay-or-both/
  3. Huberman, BA, Romero, DM & Fang, W 2008, Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
  4. Owens, S 2009, How Celebrity Imposters Hurt Twitter's Credibility, Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), viewed 9 June 2010, http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2009/02/how-celebrity-imposters-hurt-twitters-credibility051.html
  5. Yarow, J 2010, Twitter Finally Reveals All Its Secret Stats, Business Insider, viewed 9 June 2010, http://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-stats-2010-4